Tag Archives: copyright

Not stealing …

If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property. Society may give an exclusive right to the profits arising from them, as an encouragement to men to pursue ideas which may produce utility, but this may or may not be done, according to the will and convenience of the society, without claim or complaint from anybody.

via: http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a1_8_8s12.html

Unlock and Load

Failed Business Model

Search Engine is a CBC Radio podcast that I have been enjoying for some time. Today they announced that they would be expanding their voice to other CBC outlets, but not continuing with the podcast in the present form. For their last show they managed to get Industry Minister Jim Prentice on the line for 10 minutes to address listener concerns regarding Bill C-61. Although not necessary surprised by this government’s lack of understanding of the complexities of enforcement and sheer sustainability of such legislation, I was left somewhat agog at the Minister’s inability to address the concerns and situations presented with certainty and clarity.

The Education and Research amendments posted on the Industry Canada website are still singing the ‘digital copies for single print use only’ refrain which is mind boggling in a age of portable media devices and digital text.

There is much talk of ‘digital locks’ in Minister Prentice’s plan which reminded me of this article regarding the sheer folly of DRM and ‘digital locks’ and how applying a dabble of crowdsourcing to an ‘unbreakable lock’ usually results in egg-faced DRM engineers – DVD Jon is a good case in point.

This Bill is in its third reading and it looks like it might be become law unless saner minds prevail. Let’s hope the Canadian government doesn’t make a criminal out of me.